Wednesday, August 6, 2008
One Down, One to Go!
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Nearing the end
Monday, June 23, 2008
Ott Light Technology
http://www.ott-lite.com/Cms/home.aspx
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Technology and Teaching
Not the radical idea one might think...
The profession that I am “in” offers the chance to be both teacher and scholar. I’m challenging myself to find practical ways to incorporate technology into my pedagogy and research but I have to say that it’s already a big part.
The research project that I’m taking on for Dr. Pagnucci’s class has to do with the AA-320 Fashion Research and Communication class that I teach. Although I hesitate to take this on as a dissertation topic – simply because I have so many other ideas that I want to work with – there is a good chance that this project will be so rich that I won’t want to put it down. By the way, my research topic has to do with introducing blogging into the fashion writing course.
Technology is already a significant part of this course and this is evident because the overhead and the screen are on almost every time we meet. I often email links to myself so that I can whip them out in class for the students to view. We often watch runway video in order to write the fashion report. Students will often refer to YouTube videos in class as well as specific websites that are related to their fashion news topics. And if we need an illustration during our class discussion the students are welcome to pull it up on the computer and show it to the class in order to make a point. We all leave with more knowledge when those illustrations because practical rather than theoretical!
Technology-based goals for the upcoming academic year:
For one thing, I’ll continue working to establish a presence on the web. My teacher webpage should be finished in about a week- something that I’m really excited about. The next step is to get a webpage going for AA-320, the fashion research course. That may be more difficult because of time constraints. The first priority will be to establish my own fashion news blog, which is the challenge that I am issuing to the students and I want to be writing when they are. To practice what I’m asking them to do seems important as I take on this project. Those 3 goals seem like a good start for this next academic year.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Post # 4 Literacy
On Literacy
It seems to me literacy is (partially) a process that is influenced by numerous factors: social, economic, technological, and educational. The emphasis here though, is that literacy is a process – it can evolve in different ways as the process is impacted by different variables.
On the surface, literacy has to do with reading and writing, or as a way we label people, either as “literate” or “illiterate.” The natural extension of this is that literacy is something of an operating software that drives individual human lives, the operating systems of society (business and politics), and the formation and transmission of knowledge. The quality of the software, its efficacy, and the speed at which it operates, are all dependant upon social/economic variables. Without this software – without literacy – the world isn’t going to run. (At this moment if I could set some Postman lyrics to music involving repetition of the word CONFUSION, I would. I’m thinking of the state of the world, a broad phrase meant to encompass anything negative, which leads me to think that our varying literacies have obscured rational communication from the political to proletarian level. The flow of info. from politics to the people, I mean.) From these observations, it seems that I connect with Richard Ohmann’s ides on literacy.
It’s isn’t easy to generalize as we see from the scholarship that we’ve been considering in class. In fact as I compose this blog entry I find myself wanting to write pages of text that include highlights from our readings – but WAIT! We did that already. So I’ll limit this, for now, to a few tasty points.
- Freire + Macedo > language + reality are interconnected > all things are texts> reading the world precedes reading the word. Critical perception leads to interpretation, which eventually leads to rewriting the word. Oh yeah!
Finally, to address the person question: How do I understand literacy based on my own experiences? After volunteering with a community literacy program that seeks to read aloud to kids in housing crisis (The Reading Connection) and provide them with free books of their own, I still have more questions than answers when it comes to literacy issues. I’m thrilled to have the personal and practical experience of exposing kids to books, reading, and discussion based on their reading, but also find it difficult to solve some of the ESL barriers that arise. Hopefully some of my readings in this program will help me begin to answer those questions. For now, I’m settling on the experience of reading with the kids and helping them develop a love for books that comes from exposure to many types of reading material (from picture books, to graphic novels, to magazines, as well as traditional books).
- To be aware of both current scholarship in our discipline as well as current research regarding literacy.
- To apply both scholarship and research to society/culture and the classroom.
- Find ways to empower students to grow in their own interpretation of text as well as the world around them.
- Question literacy structures/inequities in the system.
As literacy teachers, it’s a given that we want to empower our students and give them tools that will help them succeed in life. It seems to me that professors can sometimes be gatekeepers of knowledge by controlling the discourse and perhaps unintentionally barring students from entering the discourse. More effort could be made to create discussion with our students where they can learn to deconstruct certain language structures around them. If they are interested, that is. So, at the college level, we want to expose our students to the discourse of our discipline and give them practical examples of how this discourse works.
Post # 3 Thoughts on Technologies
I'll admit that I might be able to get hooked into Second Life simply because I love exploring things and I'm curious to know what the boundaries are. Second Life is a good introduction since I suspect that the use of avatars will become more prevalent as time passes - if for nothing else than a new aspect in entertainment. (See the USA TV Network's character arcade for an example.)
We've tried a number of technologies other than second life: homepages, blogs, and film. With the exception of a blog that I use(d) to write about my travels, each of these was something that I always wanted to learn more about but never knew how to. It's great to have a class where learning each of these modules is a requirement. The only negative is that I feel restricted with my lack of experience in designing a webpage. How am I going to learn all of these cool tricks? (Remember tricks like up,up, down,down, left, right, left, right, select for Mario Brothers?) Somehow it doesn't seem as easy as playing video games but I already know the answer for why that is.
It's all a matter of time. If I sit here with my laptop for 3 hours tonight, googling for different advice and techniques, I will surely learn. I know that from past experience. Instead of doing that, though, I dedicate those hours to reading, browsing new texts, researching meaning for different questions that pop up in my reading, etc. For some reason, I'm finding it more challenging to carve out the computer time because it's so easy for me to get sucked up on the web and it doesn't seem as dedicated as reading does. Twisted, I see.
There is room in the classroom for these technologies. I've encouraged my fashion students to blog about fashion happenings in our area and one of them took me up on the idea. She used her blog to represent some of her work when applying for internships. I would love to create a homepage that could provide links for my first-year comp. course and also fashion research. I'm not yet sure where these practices fit in at the scholarly level for me. On a personal level I sense that learning and utilizing these technologies will cause me to grow in my thinking and to "keep up" with my students in the world of technological advances.
Post # 2 DISSERTATION
In spite of this stumbling block in my mind and my general reluctance to talk about the dissertation, when the word is mentioned, I see myself in a business suit, some years distant from now, talking about an aspect of the writing process, such as revision. Or breaking down the challenges of addressing both ESL and non-ESL issues in a first-year composition classroom. Or... my most recent idea of a study reviewing my home university's staff grading process for EN-101 midterm and final exams.
After reading for our research methods class, I find myself wanting to create a study complete with questionnaire, student and faculty participation, interviews, and heck, why not even throw a focus group in there? This is serious though as I find the practice of staff grading and the attempt to offer objectivity to students to be a fascinating concept and intrinsically problematic practice.
The most exciting aspect of taking on this last topic is the idea of conducting a study and analyzing results that would offer analysis, which could be applied to a real-life practice at Marymount. The jury will be out in regard to this dissertation topic but my mind is open.
Monday, June 9, 2008
Introductory Reflections
The short answer: everything that I had hoped it would be. These first weeks of class have been filed with challenging texts and terminology that cause me to reflect + healthy discussion that has opened up new cavities in my mind. This is more than a "glass half full" experience because the climate and conditions on the IUP campus are healthy and prime for both personal and intellectual growth.
The student experience is surely different from many programs since we meet for a concentrated ten week summer program. Unlike my M.A. program when classes took place in the late afternoon and lasted for 3 hours a pop, we meet daily in two hour chunks per class. I find that this enables me to build on the learning and to steep in the new ideas that are coming my way. It's easy to build a rapport within the cohort and the group is an excellent one - diverse and interesting.
There aren't any particular challenges to report YET...that being said, a crisis bound to develop tomorrow. I'm wired to enjoy intense experiences and spontaneity so the program structure, hours, and schedule are working well for me. I will report that the dining hall is a disappointment and it's tricky to get a good meal in during the 45 minutes between our two classes. That has to do with time as well as quality - is this the land of processed food? Imagine a cafeteria that is more like a giant vending machine - except there isn't anything as tempting as a Snickers bar. Help!
The aspect of the experience that is most rewarding is the simple fact that I'm in a doctoral program enjoying 6 credit hours of coursework and finally getting to start something that I have been working toward for the past ten years. Education is a privilege and I feel fortunate to be studying at an institution that values both scholarship and practical pedagogy. It isn't a lack of transparency or defense mechanism driving me to log these positive comments - it's simply the truth.